Praveen,

> Should the draft stick to only those reqirements that are 
> essential and steer clear of the others ?? After all it might be 
> tough to capture all optional features in the draft.

I think that the draft should capture most all of the basic
IPv6 RFCs at the level needed.  For some, sub-requirements
may need to be explicitly called out, while for others,
simple level of support needed may be enough.

John

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to