Hi all, > I agree, at least to a degree: I believe the optimal category should be > BCP or Informational. PS (as is currently in the charter) is also fine, > though I see little which would require this -- and in fact might give a > wrong picture of the nature of the memo.
My opinion is that the document should be a BCP. Hopefully, the chairs could confirm or deny this. > But this is a discussion we probably have had many times -- too bad I just > remember the outcome and justifications (well, one: IPv4 NodeReqs was PS > for reasons given by Tim). IPv4 Node Req predated PS, etc. notations, I think. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
