On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:04:17AM -0800, Michel Py wrote: > Mike, > > At this point in time I would advise to consider site-local addresses > dead. Although I was among those who voted not to deprecate them, the > problem needed to be solved and we need to move on. You could use a 6to4 > address with an RFC1918 address as the v4 address. For 10.0.0.0/8 this > translates into 2002:0A00::/24.
I could do, but (in my mind) that's worse than using a site-local address! However if the final decision has been made I guess something like this may be the best option, unless... > Why don't you request a /32 from RIPE anyway? I think I may try, I expect cost will be an issue though (i.e. it would have to be free of charge). Thanks for the advice, Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
