On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:43:24PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > But would there be a problem in using any legitimate /48 prefix instead? >
It's not really enough address space... ideally I think we should be offering each site connected to the network a /48 like an ISP would. I suppose in reality less would be sufficient, perhaps a /56... If everybody connected to the network had a /48 from their ISP it would be ok, but that's not going to be possible for a while. Also if you're giving people a global address, then they would probably expect it to be exactly that (i.e. globally routable). Whereas in this case it wouldn't be... Cheers, Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
