On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> The same people are also trying to understand why a number of > applications doesn't work in their network and how come that trojan > send their password file to a unknown destination. Private addresses > comes at a cost that is becoming more and more apparent. No need to pay > that price in IPv6 as well as in IPv4. You can uniquely map each and every local address to a combination of a single /64 + 64-bit unique id. So, organizations who care can have static mapping. > > If you absolutely want NAT take a random address block and NAT it for > you. You will get the same problems / benefits. It would be nice to know that this block is not used for something else. > > Site-locals was voted down in the WG meeting in SF. > > - kurtis - > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
