Tony Hain wrote: > ... From reports I heard the whole > SF discussion was based on a bogus assertion that SL == NAT.
I think the point was more that by eliminating a whole layer of complexity from the scoping rules, we resolve the whole bunch of problems generated by all the usage models for SLs. I agree that this is orthogonal to NAT. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
