On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 20:55, Ole Troan wrote:
> > It would be more efficient to always do DAD with the link-local prefix
> > rather than full address, and just ensure that each IID is owned by a
> > single machine. I.e., if you configure P:ID, do dad with FE80:ID (unless
> > already done) and defend all X:ID.
>
> sure, but that wouldn't allow different nodes using the same IID with
> different prefix.
This is not recommended, anyway.
> note the mechanism is called DAD not DIID. this has
> been discussed to death numerous times, please refer to the archive.
I know. Means people still disagree about it.
MikaL
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
