Hello Itojun, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
> how can you prevent random other node to assign P::X (which you are > using and verified fe80::X by DAD) on the interface? DIID does not > work in practice. That's not supposed to happen, because the other node would be prevented from autoconfiguring the corresponding link-local address. Perhaps you are suggesting that bad things can happen if nodes do not do DAD, or exhibit some other protocol violation. In that case I would agree with you, but I don't think that is a suitable basis for making such decisions. I am in the group that believes DIID is a (far!) better solution. It is certainly more scalable, and it retrieves for our future benefit the ability to use many routing prefixes on the same link. Regards, Charlie P. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
