Eric,

There are 35,184,372,088,832 48-bit prefixes available under the current
IPv6 allocation scheme. I think that allows for a rather significant
increase in the world population before we run out, or have to use the
other 87.5% of the total address space.

Address space is certainly no argument for private addresses.

(Before anyone starts a side track, the fact that we have enough space
doesn't automatically provide an allocation scheme or routeability, but
those are separate issues.)

   Brian

EricLKlein wrote:
> 
> > > Done this way we will be defingin IPv7 real quick, as the unused
> > > addresses
> > > will add up very fast.
> >
> > There are a _lot_ of IPv6 routing prefixes, namely 281,474,976,710,656
> > (assuming every allocation is a /48 as is the current plan (last I
> > heard)).  Right now, there are about 120K routing prefixes in the
> > Internet.  I think IPv7 is a ways off.
> >
> 
> Not if we are assigning 200 addresses to each user (never to be reclaimed in
> many cases) They touted IPv6 as 1 address per person in the world for years
> to come. Look at the future.
> 
> You will need (assumes modern western culture person other cultures may have
> different requirements as defined by B. Gates):
> 1 address per node on your computer (all must be registered as local
> addresses are going away according to the list)
> 1 address for your work computer + printer + other "smart" device
> 1 address per hand held (Palm, IPaq, etc)
> 1 address per cellular phone
> 1 address per regular phone (possibly 1 per physical extension in your
> house - but I think that can be avoided)
> 1 address per appliance on your network - Refrigerator, dishwasher, air
> conditioner, alarm system, car radio, etc (again all must be registered as
> above)
>  and more address as they are used.
> 
> This will make it a case of the person in 2000 who has 15 phone numbers for
> their family of 4 changing to the person in 2005 who had 200 IP addresses
> (or names that DNS to addresses) for their house plus 50 addresses for that
> same family of 4.
> 
> Some sort of local addresses space is a must.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to