>> Michel Py wrote: >> If the routing table contains IGP or connected routes with >> a mask of /64 as it should be the longest match route will >> prevail over the 2002::/16 route associated with the tunnel >> interface and traffic should flow.
> Pekka Savola wrote: > You're making an assumption that all nodes implementing 6to4 > pseudo-intefarce take part in the IGP to get the more specific > 2002:FOO routes, Well, yes but these nodes are only routers. Hosts MUST NOT have any 6to4 pseudo-interfaces (or have it deactivated). > or the topology is simple enough that there is only one subnet No. The point is multiple subnets indeed. > (and the site admin expects the default route to do the job). Yes. Default route on a given subnet points to the router. The router participates in the IGP and has specific routes. > I do not believe this is realistically the case for what's > being proposed. For what reasons? Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
