> On 27 Mar 2003, Mika Liljeberg wrote: >> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 19:00, Pekka Savola wrote: >> > > Well, yes but these nodes are only routers. Hosts MUST NOT have any 6to4 >> > > pseudo-interfaces (or have it deactivated). >> > >> > There is no such statement anywhere that I know of. Please correct me if >> > I'm wrong. Hosts indeed have 6to4 pseudo-interfaces. >> >> You're right. However, I think it's just common sense that a host, which >> sets up a 6to4 pseudo interface by default, should also automatically >> disable it if a router is sending RAs with 2002:xyz:: prefixes. >> Otherwise the host implementation is broken.
it should disable it for any received RA, i.e when it is on a native link. > Maybe, maybe not. In many cases, the node implementations include both > host and router behaviour. In such case, automatically disabling > something may not be the best option. > > This may be something worth fleshing out when/if we progress 6to4 to DS > at some point :-) a host connected to a native link should not automatically enable a 6to4 pseudo interface. /ot -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
