John Bartas wrote: > If IPv6 has a better anonymity solution, can someone > point me to it? Or do I have to start working on NATv6? > (See, this is why I don't always want to identify myself! > :-)
See RFC 3041 - It does exactly what you want without the drawbacks of NAT. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
