On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Tony Hain wrote: > John Bartas wrote: > > If IPv6 has a better anonymity solution, can someone > > point me to it? Or do I have to start working on NATv6? > > (See, this is why I don't always want to identify myself! > > :-) > > See RFC 3041 - It does exactly what you want without the drawbacks of > NAT.
NAT, applied *where*? On your DSL/cablemodem/etc. box -- about right. By the ISP? RFC3041 doesn't give you anything except a false sense of anonomity and broken apps. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
