Jeroen Massar wrote: > ... > Did you even _read_ the two drafts? one even has the > word 'auto' in it. There will be no registry involved here, > except for the one registering MAC/EUI64 or other unique > addresses from which the automatic unique address is derived. > No money involved there, just a correct way of dealing with a > load of space without duplicates. > > Morning Tony ;)
Both of those are creating /64's that can't be routed well within an enterprise network. A proposal that creates globally unique /48's would be appropriate. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
