> > This simple suggestion will in fact prevent using SL in the NAT > > scenario, > > It will prevent _Standards Compliant_ client implementations from > using NAT, but as we both know many vendors loosely interpret > standards in any case.
You don't get the point. If enough hosts come programmed to enforce scope restrictions, then the non compliant product ends up with a deployment headache and has to be fixed. This is basically the root of Internet standards -- enforcement by peer pressure. -- Christian Huitema -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
