>> Michel Py wrote: >> Yep. As I have said before, as long as CNN, Google, eBay, >> eTrade, Yahoo and consorts are not IPv6 enabled (which >> also means multihomed for these guys) IPv6 does not exist >> for the general public.
> Not quite: I disagree with your last statement. > Nothing stipulates that all, or even a commonly used part > of, Internet applications must use IPv6 before "IPv6 exists > for the general public". > For example, a single popular p2p app could do it just fine. It would have to be the killer app that IPv6 so desperately needs. Short of the new Napster with a guarantee that the RIAA would not try to kill it immediately, I have not heard of such thing. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
