Hi John,

I know this is a difficult topic, and we don't enforce the vendors, but we do "de 
facto".

I mean, if a vendor don't pass a given RFC in a conformance/interoperability, because 
they do NAT, then a lot of customers (ISPs,
Telcos) will not purchase it, because that's what the market do most of the time. And 
this is a "market" enforcement ...

What about something like:

IPv6 has enough addressing space that allows avoid the need of any kind of address 
translation, that is considered harmful according
[RFCxxxx]. Consequently, IPv6 nodes MUST NOT support any kind of address translation.

Regards,
Jordi

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:11 AM
Subject: RE: avoiding NAT with IPv6


Hi Jordi,

> If we include, for example, in the node-requirements, that
> one of the IPv6 node requirements is to "avoid" the support of NAT or any
> other kind of address translation mechanism (I'm not
> suggesting exactly this way to say it), any vendor that do that, can be
> "banned" by the community and the Interop/Conformance test,
> because he is not complying with the specs.
>
> Some still will do that, but we can then tell the network
> managers and users, that the product is NOT IETF complaint.

I feel ambigious about this - avoiding NATs is a good thing, however
IETF is not a protocol enforcement agency.  Interop & conformance
testing happens outside of the IETF, so I am not sure this is
in scope for the IETF.

Additionally, the WG chairs chartered the Node Requirements work
to document existing requirements, and I actually don't think
we have any IPv6 RFCs that have any related statements like
'You MUST NOT NAT IPv6' ... so I am unsure how to procede on
this subject.

That noted, there are well known RFCs published already on
the dangers of NATing, so I'm not sure what good it would do
to put something in the Node Requirements document.

Finally, I actually don't know what a reasonable requirement
would be to add to cover this.  If you think you have good text,
please send it on the mailing list.

John

*****************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on-line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to