Hi all,
For what it's worth, my opinion is:
"NO -- Do not deprecate site-local unicast addressing".
because:
- Site-locals should be retained for disconnected sites.
- Site-locals should be retained for intermittently
connected sites.
- Site-locals should be retained as a means for internal
connections to survive global prefix renumbering.
- Other: I think that there is a need for private address
space & provider independent address space.
I would be happy to have a BCP on Site Locals,
even if it listed reasons for not using them (or
when they SHOULD/MUST NOT be used); I'd accept
tighter controls on their usage, and so forth.
br,
John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
