Well stated. I agree with this list. /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Sommerfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:28 PM > To: Margaret Wasserman > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CONSENSUS CALL: Deprecating Site-Local Addressing > > > YES -- Deprecate site-local unicast addressing > > Does not provide any tangible security benefit. > Provides false sense of security. > Increases application complexity. > Reduces application reliability. > Requires too many compensating hacks to other protocols. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
