>
> > From: Margaret Wasserman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Over time, implementations will cease to provide special handling
> > for FECO::/10 (many don't provide any special handling for this
> > prefix today, BTW)
>
> Well, I don't provide any special handling for FEC0::/10 (other than
> noting address is site level). I already have to implement scoped
> handling due to link locals. Site-local processing just comes free
> after that.
You have partial support for link-locals. No implementation
has full support because that would require making link-locals
first class addresses at all levels and the work to do that has
not been done to specify how to do this.
The work to do this is roughly equivalent to that required to
get site-locals to the level of first class addresses.
Mark
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
