Margaret,
On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 19:31, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Tony, allowing an interface to have two addresses:
>
> - One that is globally routable and globally accessible, and
> - One that is stable and local,
>
> is _exactly_ what I am proposing.
>
> However, I am proposing that there is _no reason_ why the stable, local
> addresses have to be ambiguous.
Then I would propose that this solution must be introduced at the same
time the current FECO::/10 is deprecated, in a new version of the
addressing architecture. That I would have no objections to. Let's stop
the April Fools' poll now and start writing some drafts.
MikaL
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
