>>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:41:53 +1000, 
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

>       Is the following a legal IPv6 literal?  The RFC's are unclear
>       about whether leading zeros are allowed or not if they would
>       make a segment more than 4 character wide.

>               1234:1234:1234:1234:01234::

>       Note I would never expect inet_ntop() to produce the above.

>       We were discussing this when reviewing our inet_pton()
>       implementation.

Apparently there has been no consensus on this.  The source of the
lack of consensus is an ambiguous text in RFC 3513:

   1. The preferred form is x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x, where the 'x's are the
      hexadecimal values of the eight 16-bit pieces of the address.

Some people interpret "01234" as a 16-bit piece, and others do not.
If we can only refer to this text, I don't think we can go further.

Meanwhile, a recent draft draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep-00.txt points out
that RFC 2373, the previous version of the address architecture RFC,
had an ABNF than invalidated "01234":

      IPv6address = hexpart [ ":" IPv4address ]
      IPv4address = 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT "." 1*3DIGIT

      IPv6prefix  = hexpart "/" 1*2DIGIT

      hexpart = hexseq | hexseq "::" [ hexseq ] | "::" [ hexseq ]
      hexseq  = hex4 *( ":" hex4)
      hex4    = 1*4HEXDIG

And the draft itself defines a revised and precise version of the
ABNF, which also prohibits "01234" from being used as a "16-bit
piece."

I don't remember why the ABNF was removed in RFC 3513, but, regardless
of the reason, I believe the address architecture authors actually
intend at most four hex digits.

So, assuming we can agree on draft-main-ipaddr-text-rep-00.txt and the
draft will clarify RFC 3513, can we conclude here that inet_pton()
should reject more than four hex digits as a 16-bit piece?

                                        JINMEI, Tatuya
                                        Communication Platform Lab.
                                        Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to