[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't see the need as long as the result is 16-bits, but would like to
> > see if there are other opinions.
>
> My opinion would be to reject more than 4 hex digits.
RFC 2553, section 6.6:
#define INET6_ADDRSTRLEN 46
I'm not 100% sure about the relevance of this, but it seems like a good
reason not to allow exta digits.
--
Dean C. Strik Eindhoven University of Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ipnet6.org/
"This isn't right. This isn't even wrong." -- Wolfgang Pauli
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------