Eliot, >> Michel Py wrote: >> We don't throw away a published standard with running code >> from multiple vendors in exchange for the promise that >> _maybe_ someone will be able to produce a replacement that >> meets the requirements.
> Eliot Lear wrote: > It is true that we should not make standards where there is no > running code. However, Running code != good practices or even > good ideas. And we do have running code (with both good and > bad ideas) for now while we figure out this question- it's > called IPv4. I will remind you that the official IETF position is that IPv6 is in production, which led to the creation of the v6ops WG. IPv6 is no longer a prototype we can tinker with. Or maybe you recommend a gracious restart? Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
