% Bill,
%
% > Bill Manning wrote:
% > what an odd point of view. if, as is asserted, the
% > IPv6 is "production" then why are we still seeing
% > drafts changing the address format?
%
% You are making my point. I am not the one that states that v6 is
% operational, BTW.
% http://ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2002/msg00000.html
%
% Michel.
%
ah.. perhaps my issue is that your original note
used the term "production", while now you use the
term "operational". they are different words w/
distinct meanings.
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
