On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 07:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like a strong draft. Several issues exist though.
1) There is no mention of RFC 3041 (privacy enhanced) addresses. Both the issue as to if they should be responded with and if they should be responded to needs to be addressed.
just FYI from implementation POV: KAME implementation does not include RFC3041 addresses in the response by default. there's a configuration flag bit which makes the responder to include RFC3041 addresses as well.
i guess that sensible default would be not to include RFC3041 addresses.
Including RFC3041 addresses in the list of global addresses returned is one part of the issue.
The other one is: if a NIQ is send to a RFC3041 address, do you reply to it?
My take is that by default, you should not and have a switch to override.
- Alain.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
