On the contrary, maybe, providing a /48 while having a /32 as an ISP makes NAT coming as a solution, according to the potential number of customers... and, for sure, I do agree that we have to make NAT silly.
Alain. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoy� : jeudi 17 juillet 2003 11:31 > � : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: Fw: avoiding NAT with IPv6 > > > Making NAT look silly is good. One case I see where IPv6 NAT > still doesn't > look completely silly is where ISPs hand out /64s to end > users. Pay your > EUR10, buy your IPv6NAT and you have a /48. > > Mat. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 17 July 2003 11:16 > > > > Once we have such a thing, we can make positive > > requirements for exploiting it that make NAT look silly. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
