Bob, > Bob Hinden wrote: > Please respond to the list with your preference
I would prefer C. "Rough consensus and running code". Possibly I could live with B, but it greatly depends on how difficult the new solution is to implement. If everyone agrees that implementing the new solution is a no-brainer, then B would be fine. However, if the new solution requires significant coding that many people don't feel too good about it, C is required. We don't want to deprecate for a solution that looked good on paper but proved impossible to implement and be left with zip. I have trouble understanding why the issues that applied to site-locals would not apply as well to the new solution until I have seen the new solution. IMHO the choice between B and C is premature until we have a clearer view of the alternatives. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
