> I would like to hear from the working group on how we should proceed. I
> think the choices are:
>
> A) Deprecate Site-Local addresses independently from having an alternative
> solution available. This would mean that the working group should treat
> the deprecation, and requirements and solution documents outlined above
> independently from each other. If there was no consensus on an alternative
> a replacement would not happen.
"A".
Site locals as presently defined are incomplete. I believe that they
represent a "wrong turn" taken a while back. We need to make a clear
statement that no energy should be wasted in implementing/supporting
them in application and other upper-layer protocols.
- Bill
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
