Is this sufficient? Would it better to also include an "operational considerations" or similar section? More text on why this is important?
Bob,
Putting aside Michel's comments just for the moment, this would seemingly be necessary, but I don't know if there is anything you can write to make it sufficient. That will be a test of time. As I said earlier, I think the draft is a substantial advance over previous attempts.
I do think Michel's comments need to be addressed. The issue is really an expectations game. Venders speak the language of money, and that overrides whatever language is in the draft :-(
Eliot
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
