> > Since IPv6 prefixes are going to be mapped along the same > > boundaries as IPv4 prefixes ie., layer 2 broadcast domains, > > IPv6 route filtering in an government network will be just as > > dull a tool as it is in IPv4. > > This shows IPv4 thinking, where the network has a single prefix / L2. > While I agree the initial deployments will likely mirror the IPv4 > network, there is no reason to preclude having additional prefixes / > L2, where the reachability characteristics are different.
...except that apps won't have any way of knowing which prefixes to use for which purposes. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
