Citerat fr�n Michel Py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Among who? You continue to talk about consumers and how > > things would be easier for them with site-locals. No > > consumers are using route filtering today. No consumers > > will need to use route filtering. > > On which planet are you living? I have seen hundreds of consumer > networks that use route filtering. Even on my home router I have a > dozen > of route-maps. Get real.
Planet Earth. Please describe for me what consumer networks (a home connection to an ADSL provider for example) that have dynamic routing with their service providers? Because I sure hope that those service providers have a single line, deny everyting, in their route-filtering with their consumer customers. > > ISPs use route filtering. People with corporate networks > > use route filtering. But they do it for the other reasones > > (see above), not for security. > > That is blatantly false. Ok, so you mean that people like Sprint and Telia doesn't use route-filtering on their BGP peers in order to allow only paying customers transit? And that they doesn't use route-filtering on their incoming BGP peers from multihoming customers to ensure that those customers do not announce the Internet back to them? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
