Thirded, and agreed. IPv6 or V6Ops though?
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:07:53AM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > Eliot Lear writes: > > I'd like to put Fred on the spot (not having asked him) and propose that > > his draft be adopted as a WG doc. > > I'd like to second that. Fred's document if > nothing else shows how close we aren't to meeting > the operational goal of renumbering without > significant blood-letting. Also: Fred's document > is aimed at a solution for somebody with enough > leverage to join the providers BGP cabal. While > that's a start, it doesn't explore this problem > nearly enough, IMO, especially for BGP have-nots. > > Mike > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
