> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > "But mommy, if the geeks don't use it, they probably don't > > > want to rely on it either, so why should I ?" > > > > I rely on IPv6 every single day, and I think I qualify as a > > geek. That doesn't mean I think it's a good idea to fragment > > the IPv4-based email or web infrastructures. > > With fragmenting you imply IPv6 only ?
no, I'm implying that some are running IPv6 only while others are running IPv4 only, which further implies that there are hosts that cannot communicate with one another. as I said, I'm not against ietf.org supporting v6 SMTP. I just don't think it's important for them to do so. but neither is it worth taking up list bandwidth to hammer out exactly why it is or isn't important. I've made my point; you may now have the last word. Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
