On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 13:45:10 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> > I periodically ask the IETF chair about this. I suggest that anyone
> > who thinks it is important for ietf.org to support IPv6 to send mail
> > to the IETF chair.
>
> I think it's not terribly important. The principal value would be for
> show, not for utility. And IMHO it sends a misleading message.
Ah, got you :-) I receive my email at home by port forwarding SMTP
through a NAT box (email server behind a NAT home router). I prefer
to receive SMTP normally, without going through NAT. That's possible
when the mail is sent via IPv6 transport.
Are you really advising me to continue to use NAT :-)
rvdp
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
