In case there was any doubt that the WG has no clue what the vote
meant,

The vote meant we're going to stop using SLs, IMHO because it became clear that whatever problems SLs were supposed to solve, they weren't worth the cost.

We haven't voted on what solutions we were going to recommend for the
problems that people claimed (sometiemes erroneously) that SL addressed.
We haven't even agreed on what those problems are, or whether they all
really exist.

Agreed. No replacement is also a replacement. That said, I think there is a lot left to discuss on what to recommend for the cases that have been brought up.


- kurtis -

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to