> Hi Margaret, thanks for your prompt response.
> I still do not understand how does the fact that a Hinden/Haberman address
> is globally unique, removes the need for a zone id/ site id. How does it
> settle with paragraph 6 of the Hinden/Haberman ID? ("site boarder routers
> SHOULD NOT forward any packets with local Ipv6 source or destination address
> outside of the site"). If I develop a boarder router, which supports multi
> local address scopes, I must ID the different local scopes so I can know
> when a packet is being sent across a site boundary and to discard it.
A filter for local global addresses on the "internet interface" of the SBR
will avoid transmission of these addresses on the internet.
About the multiple local scopes connected to the router, the prefix will be
unique amongst them. Hence, there is no need to have a separate zone id. Add
an explicit route whenever there is a requirement to send a packet from one
scope to another.
CP
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
