> I have reviewed the diffs between draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt and 
RFC 4753 and agree that they fully fix the issue that was brought to the > 
IPsecME WG last week.

Agreed; support.


Scott Moonen ([email protected])
z/OS Communications Server TCP/IP Development
http://scott.andstuff.org/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/smoonen



From:
Paul Hoffman <[email protected]>
To:
IPsecme WG <[email protected]>
Cc:
Tim Polk <[email protected]>
Date:
07/09/2009 06:51 PM
Subject:
Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Last Call: draft-solinas-rfc4753bis (ECP Groups for IKE 
and



At 3:29 PM -0700 7/9/09, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >IKEv2) to Informational RFC
> >
>>The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>>the following document:
>>
>>- 'ECP Groups for IKE and IKEv2 '
>>   <draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt> as an Informational RFC
>>
>>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>>final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
>>[email protected] mailing lists by 2009-08-06. Exceptionally,
>>comments may be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please
>>retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >
>>The file can be obtained via
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt
>>
>>
>>IESG discussion can be tracked via
> >
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18680&rfc_flag=0


I have reviewed the diffs between draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt and RFC 
4753 and agree that they fully fix the issue that was brought to the 
IPsecME WG last week.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec


_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to