Paul Hoffman writes: > >IKEv2) to Informational RFC > > > >The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > >the following document: > > > >- 'ECP Groups for IKE and IKEv2 ' > > <draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt> as an Informational RFC > > > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > >final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > >[email protected] mailing lists by 2009-08-06. Exceptionally, > >comments may be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please > >retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
I read this document, and I think it is ok. One note is that when this document is published as RFC, we might need to issue errata against RFC5114 to say that the format does not follow groups specified there does not follow RFC4753 format but this new document. Or perhaps it is enough that when implementors follow to RFC4753, they will see it has been obsoleted by this document? -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
