Paul, Sorry to be late in responding. I've been working with other Juniper folks to figure out which of us should volunteer to edit the P2P VPN problem statement. But never mind about that.
I am willing to edit the P2P VPN problem statement document. I know that we need to have a draft promptly and get some serious discussion going on the email list before IETF 83. There are plenty of interesting questions related to requirements that we'll want to discuss on the list and in person at IETF 83. Praveen Sathyanarayan from Juniper has already committed to write an Informational RFC documenting our current solution. And I think it's premature to start work on the common solution before we've agreed on the problem statement or at least nailed down the main issues. Don't you agree? Thanks, Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of Paul Hoffman > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:49 AM > To: IPsecme WG > Subject: [IPsec] NUDGE: Starting work on our new charter items > > [[ There has not been enough response yet, by far. ]] > > We have a new charter. Do we have any volunteers to start work on the > two documents we committed to work on? > > Related: we should consider having a face-to-face meeting at the > upcoming IETF in Paris, but only if there is value for the newly- > chartered work. In my mind, that means both a first draft submitted > *and* interesting questions that would benefit from face-to-face > discussion instead of just work on the list. Do people believe we will > have that? > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
