I'm also voluteering to help review the drafts and develop the 
requirements.ThanksJorge CoronelMicrosoft Corp. > Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 
18:32:15 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] NUDGE: Starting work on our new charter items
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> the normal IETF way to review documents is on this list. If you want to 
> review earlier pre-published drafts of the problem statement, please 
> approach Steve Hanna privately. In any case, thanks for your participation!
> 
> For the charter: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/charter/
> 
>       Yaron
> 
> On 02/08/2012 06:26 PM, Mark Boltz wrote:
> > I will volunteer to help review the drafts and develop the requirements. 
> > How should we approach that sharing? Google, this list, something else? 
> > Also, could someone (re-)post the charter with the objectives again, I 
> > can't seem to find it. Alternatively send to me directly off list.
> >
> > I look forward to participating.
> >
> > --
> > Mark Boltz, CISSP, CISA, NSA-IEM, CSGI
> > Director, Federal and Mid-Atlantic
> > e: [email protected]   e: [email protected]
> > p: 866.869.4075               c: 571.246.2233
> > o: 202.434.8963               f: 703.997.4759
> > w: http://www.stonesoft.com
> >
> > 1200 G St. NW, Suite 800
> > Washington, DC 20005-6705
> >
> > Stonesoft: Network Security. Simplified.
> >
> > On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:12 AM, "Ulliott, 
> > Chris"<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> >> Paul - count me in, am more than happy to contribute and help review 
> >> drafts.  Unfortunately getting to Paris could be challenging, but I'll go 
> >> and talk nicely to the folk who control the purse strings!
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> >> Paul Hoffman
> >> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 4:49 PM
> >> To: IPsecme WG
> >> Subject: [IPsec] NUDGE: Starting work on our new charter items
> >>
> >> [[ There has not been enough response yet, by far. ]]
> >>
> >> We have a new charter. Do we have any volunteers to start work on the two 
> >> documents we committed to work on?
> >>
> >> Related: we should consider having a face-to-face meeting at the upcoming 
> >> IETF in Paris, but only if there is value for the newly-chartered work. In 
> >> my mind, that means both a first draft submitted *and* interesting 
> >> questions that would benefit from face-to-face discussion instead of just 
> >> work on the list. Do people believe we will have that?
> >>
> >> --Paul Hoffman
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IPsec mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> >>
> >> ****************************************************************************
> >> Communications with GCHQ may be monitored and/or recorded
> >> for system efficiency and other lawful purposes. Any views or
> >> opinions expressed in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect GCHQ
> >> policy.  This email, and any attachments, is intended for the
> >> attention of the addressee(s) only. Its unauthorised use,
> >> disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.  If you are not the
> >> intended recipient, please notify [email protected].
> >>
> >> This information is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of
> >> Information Act 2000 and may be subject to exemption under
> >> other UK information legislation. Refer disclosure requests to
> >> GCHQ on 01242 221491 ext 30306 (non-secure) or email
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >> ****************************************************************************
> >>
> >>
> >> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government 
> >> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless 
> >> Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 
> >> 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
> >> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or 
> >> recorded for legal purposes.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IPsec mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> > _______________________________________________
> > IPsec mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
                                          
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to