On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:26 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote: > I just posted following document. I think I would like to get few > minutes in Paris to explain this document, and see wheter there is any > comments to it. I think it should be forwarded as individual draft to > the RFC, but I am not sure whether it should be informational or > standards track document, and this is something I would like to get > feedback from the community.
I see no reason it should not be on standards track. > This is very similar in ideas than to the tls version > (draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-01), i.e. it shares the same format for the > raw key. And this is good. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
