I also support the draft Daniel On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:26 AM, Tero Kivinen wrote: > > > I just posted following document. I think I would like to get few > > minutes in Paris to explain this document, and see wheter there is any > > comments to it. I think it should be forwarded as individual draft to > > the RFC, but I am not sure whether it should be informational or > > standards track document, and this is something I would like to get > > feedback from the community. > > I see no reason it should not be on standards track. > > > This is very similar in ideas than to the tls version > > (draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-01), i.e. it shares the same format for the > > raw key. > > And this is good. > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > -- Daniel Migault Orange Labs -- Security +33 6 70 72 69 58
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
