Here's the first issue. So far, it has been the most contentious one! Interesting that it's the least technical issue. Hmmmm.
Anyway, if you're not happy with the proposed resolution, please suggest another. And if you support this idea, please say so. Thanks, Steve -----Original Message----- From: ipsecme issue tracker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:44 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [ipsecme] #210: What should we call this effort? #210: What should we call this effort? Many names were suggested but no consensus has emerged. The most popular candidate so far is "Auto Mesh VPN". Suggested Resolution: Choose Auto Mesh VPN unless another more popular name emerges on the email list by the end of IETF 83. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn- yaronf.ietf@… | problem@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: p2p-vpn- | Severity: - problem | Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/trac/ticket/210> ipsecme <http://tools.ietf.org/ipsecme/> _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
