I am ok to any of two names which make sense: Remote unknown VPN ( RUK-VPN) or On-demand VPN
Thanks and Regards, Yogendra Pal Ericsson, India +919686202644 On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Stephen Hanna <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's the first issue. So far, it has been the most > contentious one! Interesting that it's the least > technical issue. Hmmmm. > > Anyway, if you're not happy with the proposed resolution, > please suggest another. And if you support this idea, > please say so. > > Thanks, > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: ipsecme issue tracker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:44 PM > To: [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: [ipsecme] #210: What should we call this effort? > > #210: What should we call this effort? > > Many names were suggested but no consensus has emerged. The most popular > candidate so far is "Auto Mesh VPN". > > Suggested Resolution: Choose Auto Mesh VPN unless another more popular > name emerges on the email list by the end of IETF 83. > > -- > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn- > yaronf.ietf@… | problem@… > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: normal | Milestone: > Component: p2p-vpn- | Severity: - > problem | > Keywords: | > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/ipsecme/trac/ticket/210> > ipsecme <http://tools.ietf.org/ipsecme/> > > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec > --
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
