Although I prefer it over some of the other names, "discovery" isn't making too good an adjective here. How about "Dynamic Secure VPN" without over qualifying dynamic ?
Thanks, Manish On 19/03/12 1:27 PM, "Yoav Nir" <[email protected]> wrote: > As Tero pointed out, some of the use cases don't end up in a full mesh, > because sometimes administrators really want a trunk, so the end result could > be a mesh among nodes in the same organization, and a trunk to another. Maybe > even a partial mesh (with "secondary nodes" behind particularly bad NAT > devices connecting to one of many "primary nodes") > > So perhaps the name should not include the word "mesh". How about "dynamic > discovery VPN" (DD-VPN)? > _______________________________________________ > IPsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
