Hi Steve,
I'm fine with what you say. Just a quick comment on process: we don't
have FS (Full Standard) any more. Since RFC 6410, we have "Proposed
Standard" and "Internet Standard".
Thanks,
Yaron
On 11/20/2013 12:17 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
Yaron,
I think we should progress it to FS only if there are other protocols
that make use
of it, and which are really in use in a non-trivial fashion. I think
Sean said that he identified some such protocols when he was exploring
this topic, so we should ask Sean
for details.
Steve
On 11/19/2013 11:06 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
updated versions of RFC 4301, 4302, and 4303 have been posted:
Thank you Steve for working on these drafts. These drafts are targeted
at republication as Internet Standards. As promised in Vancouver, I
would like to open the question of whether we should be republishing
RFC 4302 - AH.
My personal opinion is that we should not. We have downgraded AH and
consistently discouraged its use, replacing it by ESP-null. People are
obviously free to implement it even if it remains Proposed Standard,
but why give the wrong message by promoting it to IS?
Thanks,
Yaron
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
