On Nov 19, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 11/19/2013 11:06 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
>> updated versions of RFC 4301, 4302, and 4303 have been posted:
>> 
>> 
> Thank you Steve for working on these drafts. These drafts are targeted at 
> republication as Internet Standards. As promised in Vancouver, I would like 
> to open the question of whether we should be republishing RFC 4302 - AH.
> 
> My personal opinion is that we should not. We have downgraded AH and 
> consistently discouraged its use, replacing it by ESP-null. People are 
> obviously free to implement it even if it remains Proposed Standard, but why 
> give the wrong message by promoting it to IS?

I agree with that.

        paul

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to