On Nov 19, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/19/2013 11:06 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
>> updated versions of RFC 4301, 4302, and 4303 have been posted:
>>
>>
> Thank you Steve for working on these drafts. These drafts are targeted at
> republication as Internet Standards. As promised in Vancouver, I would like
> to open the question of whether we should be republishing RFC 4302 - AH.
>
> My personal opinion is that we should not. We have downgraded AH and
> consistently discouraged its use, replacing it by ESP-null. People are
> obviously free to implement it even if it remains Proposed Standard, but why
> give the wrong message by promoting it to IS?
I agree with that.
paul
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec