Hi Yaron,
Is this an official poll or is it "just to see" ? If this is serious, what is
the deadline ?
thanks,
fred
On 03 Dec 2013, at 18:40, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear IPsecME folks,
>
> There is clear working group interest in a standard auto-discovery VPN
> solution. We have agreed-upon requirements [1]. And we have 3 serious
> contenders [2] [3] [4] for the solution. It is time to select a protocol to
> adopt into the working group.
>
> We would like to ask people who are *not* authors on any of the solution
> drafts to send a short message to the list, saying which of the three they
> prefer, and a few reasons for their choice.
>
> Please do *not* send mail saying which of the protocols you do *not* like -
> this would be far less useful. And please do not think up a new solution
> proposal, it's too late for that.
>
> A quick process reminder: once we adopt a protocol, it becomes the starting
> point for the working group document. The WG can change the editor team and
> is free to make material changes to the protocol before it is published as
> RFC.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul and Yaron
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7018
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mao-ipsecme-ad-vpn-protocol-02
> [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sathyanarayan-ipsecme-advpn-03
> [4] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-detienne-dmvpn-00
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
