On Dec 6, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Frederic Detienne (fdetienn) <[email protected]> wrote:
> please note that our proposal does not mandate a routing protocol. We also > support IKEv2 config exchange and treat the protected subnets as "routes" for > the tunnel. And yet Yaron and I specifically asked: On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote: > We would like to ask people who are *not* authors on any of the solution > drafts to send a short message to the list, saying which of the three they > prefer, and a few reasons for their choice. Seriously, authors: please refrain. The WG has heard enough pitches from you for your proposals and, if not, you are free to update your drafts to make them clearer. This poll is to hear from the other people in the WG. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
